wild anemones near Umm el Fahm close to the fence between Israël and Palestine
|Report from Sytse
and Marlies Tjallingii about their visit to the DROR Community in Israel
24 of February till 4 of March 2007
Why did we go to Israel?
Avi, Janice and Philo
In this report we want to tell what we did in Israel. The report is meant as a help for the CCI-2007 in the Netherlands preparation gathering to be capable to decide whether to put conditions to invitation of DROR members to the CCI 2007 or not.
The objectives of our visit:
flowers of an almondtree
What did we do?
25 of February: Evening Meeting in Jerusalem in Avi Butavia’s house with DROR members, teachers and other members who have assisted in courses and members who have done fundamentals (about 12 people). We did a mini-session (5 minutes each way). We had a sharing of all the members. Sytse and Marlies explained about CCN/CCI. Their was a special interest in our ongoing couples group we have in The Netherlands. We did a demonstration of slow/communication. We ended with a closing circle.
26 of February: Sunday afternoon A 6 hour workshop in the prison of Ramla, This workshop was the last session of a twelve weeks course for prisoners. There were 11 prisoners and about the same amount of people who came from outside the prison. The people from outside the prison were partly DROR members partly people from the friends around DROR members who were interested to come to the prison. There was a short introduction done by Avi who run the twelve weeks with Janice as an assistant. After that there was an opening circle, where everybody participated. We had a session of one of the prisoners in the group, which impressed us very much. It had to with accepting feelings dealing with guilt and building self-respect. We had two mini sessions in pairs and we had sessions in smaller groups. The basic technique used was: one person has time and the others listen and give free attention. The people who were for the first time in a co-counselling setting did participate as well. There was sometimes a situation where people reacted on the person who had said something before. This was accepted. All directions were centred around `love´, ´recognition´ and ´security´.
28 of February afternoon and evening: Sessions in Jerusalem We did two times sessions with 2 Dror people with feedback on the methods we all used as client and counsellors. From this we learnt that people start their individual sessions with Good and New. They use other terminology for the techniques which are similar to our techniques. They did not use the negotiation about contracts, what we are doing, as they suppose that the contract is clear. They ask when they give a direction (suggestion in Dutch) “Can I give a direction?”. This we don’t do in a normal contract session. Present time is the same as attention shift or in Dutch “terugkomer”. It was very opening and safe to do sessions in a smaller group and to discuss about the techniques we all used. We did 12 to 15 minutes sessions and had then 5 minutes feedback on the methods
Marlies, Haddas and Janice at the home of Haddas before a session with feedback on the methods
1 of March
Evening Workshop in Tel Aviv. We ran a workshop for 27 participants in
which we taught the following:
prepares a flipchart with information about the contracts, talks in the
pauze, the workshop with 27 participants with the flipcharts on the wall
2 of March. Evening Workshop in Yafia near Nazareth. This was a meeting of Israeli Arabs (Christians and Muslim) and Israeli Jews. They meet once a month and use some co-counselling techniques to exchange in a safe way what they experience in every day life. This groups exists for over 30 year. The structure of the evening was very much the same as in the prison workshop. Here were also people present who did participate for the first time in a co-counsel event. The main purpose is to have a dialogue between people of different cultures, which is extremely necessary in Israel and Palestine. This is one of the very few long term dialogue groups which exists. Listening, Accepting and Expression of all insights and feelings are the main purposes.
Individual talks with several people. As we stayed with Philo in his place in Jerusalem we had several talks with him. We had very intensive contact with Janice in the car and in her home with her family. We hade intensive contact with Avi and interesting exchange of views. We met in Hadas place and admired her pottery work. We stayed in Tel Aviv with Gina who is a co-counsellor as well.
Reading: We learnt about the theory which Avi has written in his website and which he uses as a basis for the fundamentals. We understood that AVI’s theory is not not considered as representative of DROR community and that it is one of the co-counselling theories that we employ in the Dror co-counselling work. As such, it is not considered as compulsory or binding, but is used by the DROR teachers when, and as much as they see fit, together with theory from other sources. (see the website: http://www.avibutavia.co.il/images/treeENG.png The link between Intelligence and Emotions). He mentions 3 basic needs: love, security and recognition and 5 distresses when the needs are not met: loneliness, helplessness, shame, fear and lack of recognition. In his theory he describes ways of dealing with these distresses and possible interventions for each of them in a co-counselling session.
1. Members of the DROR community do the co-counsel fundamentals in a mainly similar way we do. There is more that we have in common than what is different. We felt very safe to counsel with the people we met.
2. We learnt from DROR community members how they run social activities and peacebuilding, using the experience of the co-counsel members and using co-counsel techniques like free caring, supporting attention and time sharing. This has a very big potential for groups outside the co-counselling community.
3. We saw that DROR members use the theory which Avi Butavia uses in his fundamentals about the five basic distresses and possible interventions as a counsellor. This gives the co-counsellors a basic guide to how they can come to discharge and to re-built their lives. We see that people are very open to learn new methods which we taught in the workshop. They saw this as a welcome addition to what how they work.
sessions. We experimented with a new method of making sure that there
is a time space immediately after a session for feedback on the techniques
(not on the content) used in a validating way.
(Advices to the organisation committee of the CCI 2007 in the Netherlands are available on your request).
greatest strength as a human race is our ability to acknowledge our differences,
our greatest weakness is our failure to embrace them.”
Final conclusion from Sytse: the process is going on and we will be careful to build more knowledge and trust in each others methods and willing to learn.
Below some interesting pictures we toke:
orthodox jews on Sjabath
exhibition of photo's by macshomwatch (http://www.machsomwatch.org/)
Israëli muslim participating in the diologue (with his wife and baby) in Um el Fahm.
Playcentre in Amary refugee camp near Ramallah (Palestine) with Wafiah the Palestinian teacher
Arab shop in the old city of Jerusalem
centure old olive tree
Wild flowers, near the fence between Israël and Palestine
Monument in Tel Aviv with Mosque
The wall near Bethlehem (taken in jan 2006)